Target School Strategy: How to Prioritize Campus Recruiting Investments

Goldman Sachs receives 300,000 applications annually. They hire roughly 3,000 entry-level employees.

That's a 1% acceptance rate. More selective than Harvard.

No firm can recruit at every school. Resources are finite. Travel costs, recruiter time, and interview capacity all have limits. The question isn't whether to prioritize—it's how.

This guide covers target school strategy for finance firms. How to evaluate schools. Where to concentrate resources. When to expand beyond traditional targets. And how to measure whether your approach is working.

---

The Economics of Campus Recruiting

The Cost Structure

Campus recruiting isn't cheap. A single school relationship involves:

Direct costs:

• Campus visit expenses (travel, hotels, meals)
• Event costs (information sessions, receptions)
• Career fair booth fees
• Marketing materials
• Recruiting technology/platforms

Indirect costs:

• Recruiter time (salary allocation)
• Banker time (campus visits, interviews)
• Interview days and logistics
• Training for campus interviewers

The math: A serious presence at one school can cost $50,000-$150,000+ annually when fully loaded. Multiply that by 20-30 schools, and campus recruiting becomes a multi-million dollar operation.

The ROI Question

Not all schools deliver equal return on investment.

High-ROI schools: Strong yield rates (offers accepted), high performer rates, good retention.

Low-ROI schools: Many applications but few quality matches, low acceptance rates, high early attrition.

Smart firms track this data. Most don't track it well enough.

The Diminishing Returns Problem

Adding marginal schools rarely delivers proportional value.

• Your top 10 schools might provide 80% of quality hires
• Schools 11-20 might provide 15%
• Schools beyond that might provide 5%

This isn't universally true—some firms find gems at non-traditional schools. But the pattern is common enough to inform strategy.

---

Defining "Target" and "Semi-Target"

Target Schools

Schools where the firm has significant presence and dedicated recruiting resources.

Characteristics:

• On-campus information sessions
• Dedicated recruiter relationships
• Resume drops and on-campus interviews
• Banking and finance club partnerships
• Regular alumni engagement

What this means for students: Clear path to interviews. Structured process. Known timeline.

Semi-Target Schools

Schools where the firm recruits but with less dedicated presence.

Characteristics:

• May attend career fairs
• Accept applications but less structured outreach
• Networking matters more for access
• Interview slots may be limited

What this means for students: Path exists but less clear. Networking required.

Non-Target Schools

Schools where the firm doesn't actively recruit.

Characteristics:

• No campus presence
• Applications accepted but often filtered
• Students must create their own access
• Alumni connections critical

What this means for students: Possible but requires exceptional effort.

---

Evaluating Schools: The Framework

Quality Indicators

What signals that a school will produce strong candidates?

Academic metrics:

• Average standardized test scores
• Acceptance rates and selectivity
• Strength of business/economics programs
• Quantitative curriculum rigor

Finance program indicators:

• Investment banking club activity
• Case competition performance
• Historical placement rates
• Quality of student-run investment funds

Alumni network:

• Existing professionals at your firm
• Alumni in target roles at competitors
• Network engagement willingness

Placement History

Past performance predicts future results.

Track what matters:

• How many hires from this school in past 5 years?
• What's their performance rating distribution?
• What's retention rate at 2 years?
• What's promotion rate?

If you don't have this data, start collecting it. Historical performance is the best predictor of future results.

Yield Rates

Making offers doesn't matter if candidates don't accept.

Calculate yield: Offers accepted ÷ Offers extended

High yield (70%+): Strong employer brand at this school. Candidates want to work for you.

Low yield (<50%): Candidates have better options. Or your process turns them off.

Low yield is expensive. You interview, extend offers, and lose candidates to competitors. Understand why before investing more.

Cost Per Quality Hire

The ultimate metric.

Calculate: Total school investment ÷ Number of quality hires (still employed and performing at 2 years)

Compare across schools. You may find surprising inefficiencies.

---

Building Your Tier System

Tier 1: Core Schools

Your primary sources of talent. Maximum investment.

Typical allocation: 60-70% of campus recruiting budget

Activities:

• Multiple campus visits per year
• Premium information session venues
• Senior banker participation
• Strong alumni engagement programs
• Early access to recruiting timeline

Selection criteria:

• Proven track record of quality hires
• High yield rates
• Strong alumni presence at the firm
• Cultural fit with your organization

For bulge brackets, Tier 1 typically includes:

• Wharton, Harvard, Stanford (MBA)
• Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Penn, Columbia (undergrad)
• MIT, Duke, Michigan, Berkeley (depending on firm)

Tier 2: Important Schools

Meaningful sources of talent. Solid but not primary investment.

Typical allocation: 20-30% of campus recruiting budget

Activities:

• Annual campus visit
• Standard information sessions
• Some alumni engagement
• Participation in career fairs

Selection criteria:

• Good but not exceptional track record
• Reasonable yield rates
• Growth potential
• Strategic value (geographic, diversity, etc.)

For bulge brackets, Tier 2 typically includes:

• Northwestern, Chicago, Cornell, NYU
• Georgetown, Virginia, UCLA, USC
• Regional schools with strong programs

Tier 3: Opportunistic Schools

Talent exists but doesn't justify dedicated resources.

Typical allocation: 5-10% of campus recruiting budget

Activities:

• Virtual engagement (webinars, online info sessions)
• Career fair attendance (if efficient)
• Accept applications through normal channels
• Alumni-driven engagement

Selection criteria:

• Some history of successful hires
• Specific programs worth monitoring
• Diversity pipeline potential
• Cost-effective to engage

Evaluating Placement: Sample Analysis

Here's what a tier analysis might look like:

School	5-Year Hires	2-Year Retention	Performance (Top 20%)	Yield	Cost/Quality Hire
Wharton	45	85%	35%	75%	$8,000
Harvard	40	82%	32%	70%	$9,500
Penn	35	80%	28%	68%	$10,000
Michigan	25	78%	25%	65%	$12,000
Georgetown	15	75%	22%	60%	$18,000
State School X	5	85%	40%	80%	$25,000

The last row is interesting. Small sample, but exceptional performance. Worth investigating.

---

Beyond Traditional Targets

The Diversity Imperative

Traditional target schools skew demographically. If your pipeline comes exclusively from Ivy League schools, your analyst class will reflect that.

Expanding for diversity means:

• HBCUs with strong business programs (Howard, Morehouse, Spelman)
• Hispanic-serving institutions
• Schools with strong first-generation populations
• Regional schools with diverse student bodies

The business case:

• Diverse teams perform better (research supports this)
• Client bases are diverse—teams should reflect that
• Talent exists beyond traditional pipelines
• Competition for traditional talent is intense

Finding Hidden Gems

Some non-traditional schools produce exceptional candidates.

What to look for:

• Strong quantitative programs
• Active finance clubs despite limited recruiting
• Students who punch above their weight in competitions
• Alumni who've succeeded at your firm

How to find them:

• Track applications from non-target schools
• Interview candidates who impress despite background
• Ask current employees where they'd recruit differently
• Partner with diversity pipeline organizations (SEO, MLT)

The Risk of Over-Concentration

Relying too heavily on a few schools creates vulnerability.

Risks:

• Program changes at key schools affect your pipeline
• Competition intensifies at the same targets
• You miss talent elsewhere
• Homogeneity in your class

Diversification benefits:

• More resilient pipeline
• Different perspectives in analyst classes
• Discovery of undervalued talent sources
• Better employer brand at more schools

---

Executing Your Strategy

Recruiter Allocation

How you staff campus recruiting matters.

Dedicated recruiters: Assign specific recruiters to specific schools. They build relationships, understand the culture, and identify top talent.

Generalist recruiters: Cover multiple schools with less depth. More efficient but less effective per school.

The trade-off: Dedicated recruiters build better pipelines but cost more per school covered.

Best practice: Dedicated recruiters for Tier 1 schools. Shared coverage for Tier 2-3.

Alumni Engagement

Your alumni are your best ambassadors—if you activate them.

What alumni provide:

• Authentic employer brand representation
• Candidate identification and referrals
• Interview participation
• Student mentorship and guidance

How to engage them:

• Make it easy (provide talking points, logistics support)
• Recognize their contribution (internally and to students)
• Don't over-burden (respect their time)
• Coordinate across the firm (avoid conflicting messages)

Timeline Management

Campus recruiting has compressed timelines. Managing them matters.

Key dates to coordinate:

• Application deadlines
• Interview windows
• Offer deadlines
• Acceptance deadlines

The exploding offer problem: Candidates with tight deadlines can't explore other options. This hurts your brand long-term even if it secures short-term accepts.

Best practice: Reasonable timelines that allow candidates to make informed decisions. Pressure tactics backfire over time.

Information Session Strategy

Info sessions are expensive. Make them count.

What works:

• Senior bankers who can speak authentically
• Clear information about the opportunity
• Q&A time for genuine interaction
• Follow-up mechanisms to identify interested candidates

What doesn't work:

• Reading from corporate slides
• All-recruiting-team panels with no bankers
• Ignoring student questions
• No follow-up process

Measure it: Track application quality and yield from students who attended vs. didn't. If your sessions don't move metrics, change them.

---

Measuring Success

Key Performance Indicators

What should you track?

Pipeline metrics:

• Applications per school
• Application quality (resume screen pass rate)
• Interview conversion rate
• Offer rate

Outcome metrics:

• Yield rate (offers accepted)
• 90-day retention
• 2-year retention
• Performance ratings distribution

Efficiency metrics:

• Cost per application
• Cost per interview
• Cost per quality hire
• Time-to-fill

Benchmarking

Compare across schools, but also across time and against competitors.

Year-over-year: Is your performance at specific schools improving or declining?

Competitor comparison: Are you winning or losing candidates to specific competitors? Why?

Internal comparison: Which schools over-perform vs. investment? Which under-perform?

The Feedback Loop

Data should drive decisions.

Annual review process:

1. Compile metrics for each school
2. Calculate ROI by tier
3. Identify over-performers and under-performers
4. Adjust tier classifications
5. Reallocate resources accordingly
6. Set targets for next year

Without this loop, you're flying blind. With it, you continuously improve.

---

Common Mistakes

Over-Investing in Prestige

The most prestigious school isn't always the best ROI.

The trap: "We must recruit at Harvard because everyone does."

The reality: Harvard candidates have infinite options. Yield rates may be lower than less prestigious schools where you're a top employer.

The fix: Let data, not prestige, drive allocation.

Under-Investing in Relationships

Campus recruiting is relationship business. Transactional approaches underperform.

The trap: Different recruiters, inconsistent presence, no follow-through.

The reality: Career services, professors, and club leaders remember how you treat their students. Bad experiences compound.

The fix: Consistency. Same recruiters year after year. Follow through on commitments. Build genuine relationships.

Ignoring Candidate Experience

Every interaction shapes your employer brand.

The trap: Slow communication, impersonal processes, rude interviewers.

The reality: Rejected candidates talk. On social media, in club meetings, to friends. Bad experiences spread.

The fix: Treat every candidate well, regardless of outcome. Speed up communication. Train interviewers.

Not Tracking the Right Data

You can't improve what you don't measure.

The trap: Counting applications without tracking quality. Counting hires without tracking retention.

The reality: Vanity metrics hide problems. Cost per quality hire reveals them.

The fix: Build systems to track what matters. Hire where data supports it.

---

The Strategic View

Talent as Competitive Advantage

Your analyst class is your future MD class. The quality of people you recruit today determines your firm's trajectory.

Short-term thinking: Minimize recruiting costs. Fill seats.

Long-term thinking: Build sustainable pipelines of exceptional talent. Invest in relationships that compound.

The Pipeline Problem

Finance firms face increasing competition for talent.

The competitors:

• Tech companies (compensation, lifestyle, culture)
• PE and hedge funds (direct recruiting)
• Other banks (same talent pool)
• Consulting firms (similar profiles)

The implication: Employer brand matters more than ever. Candidate experience matters. Differentiation matters.

Building for the Future

The schools that produce great talent in 2030 may not be today's obvious targets.

What's changing:

• More students from non-traditional backgrounds entering finance
• Geographic shifts in talent concentration
• New programs emerging at different schools
• International pipeline opportunities

How to prepare:

• Experiment with non-traditional schools
• Build diversity pipelines now
• Track emerging programs
• Stay flexible in tier classifications

---

The Bottom Line

Target school strategy is resource allocation under constraint. You can't be everywhere. Choose wisely.

The core principles:

1. Let data drive decisions. Track cost per quality hire. Adjust based on results.

2. Invest in relationships. Campus recruiting compounds. Consistency beats sporadic presence.

3. Diversify thoughtfully. Traditional targets have limits. Explore beyond them strategically.

4. Measure what matters. Yield rates, retention, and performance—not just application volume.

5. Think long-term. Today's analyst class is tomorrow's leadership. Recruit accordingly.

The firms that win at campus recruiting don't just show up with the biggest presence. They show up strategically, build genuine relationships, and continuously improve based on results.

That's the edge. It's not about spending more. It's about spending smarter.